This guest blog article is part of a series that addresses local water quality topics written by Mary Bruno, Vashon Groundwater Protection Committee Member.
That question is bound to hijack any Island conversation about growth, be it building more affordable housing or issuing more water shares. And that’s not a bad thing. The only drinking water we have comes from the precipitation that falls on the Island and makes its way into our streams and aquifer system. We are wise to be cautious with such a precious resource.
If we just count raindrops, the forecast looks sunny. Vashon averages about 46 inches of precipitation annually. Experts estimate that the Island’s current population (11,055) uses a mere 1.3 percent of that total. But history shows us that having water doesn’t always mean having access to it. Theoretical estimates often bump up against operational realities. Here are four things to consider when we consider the question of “enough.”
Enough for what?
This is the obvious follow up. Do we have enough water to support more homes and businesses? (How many more, and where?) Enough to support more homes and businesses and combat a major wildfire? Enough to support development, contain wildfires and leave enough water in the ground to satisfy mandated stream flows and keep the saltwater that surrounds us at bay? Enough to check all those boxes and still satisfy the surge in demand that would result if all current holders of unused water rights decide to exercise them? Water District 19 (WD19), which services Vashon Town Center, has about 150 customers right now who own but don’t use their water shares. Multiply that 150 customers by the District’s 400 gallons-per-day maximum usage rate for the average single-family home and you get, “60,000 gallons a day that we have to put aside,” says Water District 19 general manager, John Martinak. Could it be that, on paper, we’re already overdrawn?
And let’s not forget the climate change wildcard. Can our water supply sustain us through longer, drier summers and more frequent and heavier downpours, which promise more runoff and less aquifer recharge?
It’s true that homeowners in many parts of the island have sunk private wells that generate the two gallons-per-minute minimum for a single-family household. The calculus changes dramatically for a large water district supplying hundreds of customers. Efforts to find wells that can reliably deliver municipal-level volumes (100-plus gallons-per-minute) “have failed,” says Mike Brown, citing historic data on drilling and water production. Mike is a recently retired professor of Earth and Space Science at the University of Washington, and a member of the Vashon-Maury Island Groundwater Protection Committee. (The Committee is preparing a report on the “enough” question.) He attributes the high failure rate to the “lateral boundaries of the aquifer.” We are, in short, at the mercy of geology. Which takes us to reality number two:
Finding the water
After enduring eight major glacial advances and retreats, Vashon is a geologic mess. Our Sole Source aquifer is not one, tidy Island-wide layer of saturation. It’s a patchwork of modest, disconnected areas of water-logged dirt. Loose, swirls of soggy sands and gravels mingle with dense water-resistant beds of compressed clays and silts. We don’t know the exact extent (those lateral boundaries) or thickness or condition of these various aquifer and aquitard units.
“It’s not a simple layer cake,” says local geologist Steve Bergman about underground Vashon. “Glaciers were deforming stuff, moving stuff, churning it around. The [water-bearing zones] are not homogeneous units of nice happy sand and gravel. They’re interbedded sands and clays and silts and, in some places, channels with coarse gravels. There’s a lot of vertical and lateral variability.” So much variability, that pinpointing pockets of potable water, especially sizable ones, is pretty much a crapshoot.
“Water witch, Ouija Board, Magic 8 Ball, expert advisers, all are equally effective,” says WD19’s John Martinak about how a Vashon water district, or anyone, for that matter, goes about locating a reliable source of drinking water. He’s not joking. “There are people that will dowse, and people that will read well logs like tea leaves and say, ‘Ohhh, if we drill here we’ll hit good water,’” says John. “But I always give the example of my neighbor, who’s got a perfectly fine well. And literally a stone’s throw from it is a King County test well. They drilled 243 feet down and didn’t hit anything.”
Getting the Water
Assuming you can find water, reality number three involves getting it. Water District 19 is the Island’s largest and most high-profile water provider. In 2022, the district delivered some 100 million gallons to its 1,500 connections, roughly 4,000 residential and commercial customers. Proposed zoning changes in its service area, if approved, will bring more residential and commercial development. That puts WD19 at the epicenter of the enough-water debate.
The district draws its supply from surface (Beall and Ellis Creeks) and groundwater (six wells) sources. The groundwater piece, about 40 percent of supply, has always been the trickiest. WD19 has drilled its share of troubled wells. Its Beall well suffers from high arsenic levels. Well 2, one of the three deep wells in the district’s well field, has seen its gallons-per-minute (gpm) rate fall from 274 gpm in 1990 to 50 gpm today. Three of the district’s other wells show similar declines in productivity. “These wells are supposed to each be [capable of producing] 200 gpm,” says John, whose team tracks the performance of the district’s well field religiously, and in real time. “What we’ve figured out from watching is that the entire well field can only sustain about 135 gpm.”
Before he came to WD19, John ran the much smaller Maury Mutual Water Company for many years. In his experience, the only way to determine the true capacity of a well, and of the aquifer it’s drawing from, is to carefully monitor performance over time. Over-pumping can foul a well by drawing in too many fine-grained particulates. Prolonged over-pumping can deplete a well’s source aquifer. You can rehab a fouled well with chemicals or good old elbow grease, at least for a while. An over-pumped aquifer can take years—decades or longer—to recover. Some never do. The Island’s Westside Water Association had to limit the use of its Anderson well in 2020 to avoid damaging the source aquifer.
“Once you have disrupted the water-bearing layer, either through overdraw or by drawing too many fines [into a well], you’re never going to return to the original capacity,” says John. WD19’s current Water System Plan calls for developing a new water source by 2036. John believes the district, “Should be looking for a new source, or source improvements, now.” The search won’t be easy, or cheap. WD19 has spent thousands of dollars on drilling and engineering fees over the years in failed attempts to find reliable wells.
Paying for the water
Money is reality number four. Moving water from source to tap is expensive. You need wells, pumps, pipes, people, chemicals, equipment. It all adds up. Martinak and WD19’s team of two admin staffers and three certified water operators handle the billing and manage the district’s six wells, multiple pump stations, one surface water treatment plant and 37 miles of aging underground pipe. The district plans to replace 6,000 feet of old pipe next year. At $400 per foot that’s a $2.5 million investment. Loan payments on the pipe replacement will run $160,000 a year for the next 20 years.
And another big-ticket item may be looming. If the state, as expected, lowers its current standard for manganese levels in drinking water, WD19 will need a way to extract excess manganese from its water supply. The Dockton Water Company recently spent $640,000 on a new manganese filtration system. Operating costs eventually get passed along to customers, who rarely rejoice at a rate hike.
What does this all mean and what if anything can, or should we do about it? I’ll save that discussion for another post. It’s best to tackle one gnarly question at a time.
So, does Vashon have enough water? The answer depends a lot on whom you ask. In general, water operators are cautious, developers and housing advocates bullish, geologists mixed, and the rest of us confused or clueless. On paper, the answer is yes. But you can’t drink paper water. So I’d qualify that yes in this way: We have enough water, for now, and IF we can afford to find it, tap it, treat it and transport it from where it is to where we need it to be.
Featured photo credit: Do we have enough water? Mary Bruno and Kate Thompson
great piece. Thanks, Mary
Cudo’s, Mary. As usual, you have hit the nail succinctly (and appropriately humourously,) on the head. Several sustainable solutions will come only from a delicate, deliberate (and humorous, honest) dialog [sorry for the over-alliteration.]
Thanks for showing up on the Community Council meeting tonight. I had 10,000 questions but the moderator Diane said NO more. Okay so I’ll try here: I’m a former manager of a Group B system with 2.4 acres of water assigned by WA-DOE (or whoever). We used about 1/5 or less annually of our allotment. 3 Questions of my 10000:1) How many other systems have an unused allotment, similar to the “150” WD19 unused shares are “down there”? 2) Our Group B system at 325 feet depth and nearby neighbor was 150′ lower than sea level. is there a calculation about water infiltration from seawater that ‘improves’ the aquifer recharge potential beyond the 37-44″rainfall to both surface and aquifer catchments? Perhaps the chemical analysis of well water’s components of various substances (iron, manganese, sulphur ect.)? 3) Is the “Groundwater” group in active dialogue with Orgs. like VHH who are building “affordable hounding projects” and in pursuit of another 125 housing units in needing of WD19 shares?
My primary interest is very selfish, self interested: finding “workforce housing” for local workers now commuting from Port Orchard/Tacoma to work in Vashon enterprises that benefit me as a consumer of their services. Water availability is my only question and the answers are a puzzle for Water Commissioners, Housing creators, visionaries.
Thanks. I’ll hold my 9,997 other questions for a few days/weeks.
affordable HOUSING projects :)))
Mary
Excellent piece. Thanks for taking the time and effort.